Comments on WIPO paper: “The protection of traditional knowledge: revised objectives and principles”
Publication date : 07/08/2006 | Document Number : 450/1017
The discussion on protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK) has given rise to two documents, considered at the ninth meeting of the Intergovernmental Committee (IGC). One(WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/5: The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Revised Objectives and Principles) deals with objectives and principles for the protection of TK: the second (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/INF/5:The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Updated Draft Outline of Policy Options and Legal Mechanisms) with policy options and legal mechanisms.
ICC supports initiatives to explore options for the protection of traditional knowledge, whether within the existing intellectual property framework or through development of new types of rights. However, ICC believes it is premature to take definitive positions on TK protection before having a clearer idea of what is included in this concept and how it is defined. Only when these points are clarified can an informed judgement be made as to whether there is a need for TK protection at an international level and what the scope of any such protection should be. To date, ICC has not reached any conclusion on these questions. ICC has raised a number of questions about TK protection in its paper ‘‘Protecting Traditional Knowledge”(12 January 2006)1. These questions for the most part have not yet been adequately addressed by the IGC.
ICC's view is that objectives, principles, policy options and legal mechanisms form a natural hierarchy.
Objectives
must be broadly agreed before principles are settled: from these flow
the policy and laws to implement them. In ICC's view, more discussion of
objectives and a much greater measure of agreement about them is
required before progress can be made. As ICC has maintained since the
Committee was set up, the objectives to be reached must largely
determine the form of the laws to implement them. Until consensus is
reached on objectives, it is vain to expect progress. For these reasons,
ICC limits its comments to the policy objectives of document
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/5, and feels it is premature to update other sections of
the document.
For further information, please contact
Daphne YONG-D'HERVÉ
Chief Intellectual Property Officer, IP Policy and Management, Intellectual Property
Tel:
+33 (0)1 49 53 28 24
daphne.yongdherve@iccwbo.org