Protecting traditional knowledge
Publication date : 12/01/2006 | Document Number : 450/2009
Increasingly the world is connected: by information, by legislation, by trade.
This leads to pressures for conformity. Intellectual property is
increasingly important to many aspects of life and its scope has been
extending. Patents are applied in more spheres, such as
molecular biology and software: special rights adapted to specific needs
– such as plant variety, chip design, and database rights – have been
devised and taken up by certain countries and regions.
Not all appreciate the merit of extending intellectual property rights.
For some intellectual property is another tool in the hands of rich nations and organisations giving them more unjustified power to exploit the poor. A
particular grievance is an imbalance of rights.
The new products and
technologies developed by multinational companies can be protected by
patents and other intellectual property rights, while 'traditional
knowledge'1, accumulated in indigenous communities over generations, is
generally unprotected by modern legal systems, and may be used freely by
all.
This perceived inequity has led to vociferous calls for the
protection of 'traditional knowledge', to provide a counterbalance to
the rights of companies in new technology. Increasingly, such calls are
given credence and have built up political momentum, to the point at
which governments may find it necessary to act.
ICC supports initiatives to explore
options for the protection of traditional knowledge, whether within the
existing intellectual property framework or through the development of
new types of rights. While there are numerous difficulties with the
concept of protection for traditional knowledge, these are not such as
to rule out such protection a priori. The advantages and difficulties
require further discussion and debate. Some consensus may result. The
debate itself can spread light, lower tensions and reduce misconceptions
on all sides.
ICC wishes to take an active part in this debate. It will contribute the experience and
perspectives of businesses, with the aim that any system put in place should be practical and promote useful objectives.
For further information, please contact
Daphne YONG-D'HERVÉ
Chief Intellectual Property Officer, IP Policy and Management, Intellectual Property
Tel:
+33 (0)1 49 53 28 24
daphne.yongdherve@iccwbo.org