Wednesday 20 November: Morning 09.00 – 12.30
Constitution of the arbitral tribunal
The appointment of arbitrators starts with a selection process often involving various issues such as the interview process, the initial disclosures and conflict checks. How should a potential arbitrator deal with these issues? What do the concepts of impartiality and independence require in concrete terms and what types and level of disclosure are required? How is the chairman selected by the co-arbitrators? The sensitive issue of the arbitrator’s fees and expenses, notably institutional arbitration vs. ad hoc, will also be discussed.
Mock cases and debate
Establishing your authority over the parties and the framework for the arbitration
The arbitrator must establish his or her authority at the outset and create a suitable framework for the arbitration. This may pose particular challenges for young arbitrators or arbitrators dealing with experienced attorneys. Participants will learn manners of setting out the rules of the process at the very beginning and how to deal with issues related to the characteristics or behaviour of the parties, such as cultural differences, recalcitrant parties or how to maintain a level playing field in order to create a balance between the parties and the temptation of helping the less experienced/weaker party.
Mock cases and debate
12.30 - 14.15 Lunch
Wednesday 20 November: Afternoon 14.15 – 17.45
Commencement of proceedings and case management techniques
This session will focus on the general administrative as well as critical procedural matters that arbitrators and parties have to deal with in order to establish an orderly and efficient process. These include issues related to jurisdiction, terms of reference, the governing law and procedural rules, multiparty arbitrations, interim measures, standards of evidence, discovery and many more. Participants will also be provided with several demonstrations on the different case management techniques available for controlling time and costs.
Questions and Answers
Conducting hearings
Conducting hearings in an efficient and fair fashion is one of the most critical and challenging tasks faced by arbitrators. Because an arbitrator is not a judicial officer with state sanctioned authority to hold parties and advocates in contempt, maintaining control and decorum may pose a significant challenge for arbitrators. The experienced lecturers will share their insights notably on the questioning of witnesses or attorneys by arbitrators, deciding whether to request additional evidence not provided by the parties and evaluating the need to appoint an expert.
Mock cases and debate
Thursday 21 November: Morning 09.00 – 12.30
Relations between arbitrators - Part 1
The relationship and interaction between arbitrators is another important component of the arbitral process. This session will focus on specific issues pertaining to relations between arbitrators such as the pathological behaviour of party appointed arbitrators, dissenting opinions and truncated tribunals, and the role of the chairman.
Relations between arbitrators - Part 2: Mock arbitral tribunal
Several demonstrations with a mock arbitral tribunal will be presented to explore and give a practical insight into the following issues: consultation with co-arbitrators before and during the hearing; getting along with your co-arbitrators; trying to build consensus; dealing with conflicting personalities or styles; dealing with perceived bias or other perceived inability to properly function.
Debate on the mock arbitral tribunal
12.30 - 14.15 Lunch
Thursday 21 November: Afternoon 14.15 – 17.45
Drafting enforceable awards
Participants will learn the general guidelines and best practices pertaining to what can be referred to as the most prominent duty of an arbitrator. Accordingly, the session will focus on the procedural as well as formal requirements, and cover the issue of the necessary substantive accuracy of the award.
Questions and answers
Working groups
Participants will be given the opportunity to study draft awards before scrutiny by the ICC International Court of Arbitration. Each working group will be responsible for reviewing part of the award and will make its comments as if it were a Counsel of the ICC Court of Arbitration Secretariat.
Mock Court Session: scrutiny of draft awards and debate
This is an opportunity for participants to witness the type of discussions that are held between members of the Court and representatives of the ICC Secretariat when reviewing a draft award. The parties to this mock court session will debate on the draft awards reviewed by the working groups.
Friday 22 November: Morning 09.00 – 13.00
Decisions as to the costs of the arbitration
The arbitral tribunal has the difficult mandatory duty to evaluate and fix the costs of the arbitration in the final award and decide in what proportion they shall be borne by the parties pursuant to article 37 of the ICC Rules. Such costs include the fees and expenses of any experts appointed by the arbitral tribunal and the reasonable legal and other costs incurred by the parties for the arbitration. Participants will benefit from the precious advice of learned practionners on how to make such decisions.
Questions and Answers
Challenge and replacement of arbitrators
This session will focus on the different procedures applicable to the challenge and replacement of Arbitrators notably under the rules of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, but also before National Courts. The concepts of impartiality and independence will be largely discussed.
Questions and Answers
Arbitrator immunity
As in many legal endeavours, the world of arbitration involves issues related to an arbitrator’s legal exposure. The faculty will discuss the nature and extent of arbitrator immunity and provide suggestions on what an arbitrator should do if he or she gets sued. The discussion will also touch upon matters relating to potential unauthorized practice of law issues.
Questions and Answers
The New ICC 2012 Rules of Arbitration’s Emergency Arbitrator provisions
Participants will benefit from a comprehensive presentation of these brand new provisions, providing parties with potential emergency relief prior to the arbitral tribunal’s receipt of case. The main questions why? when? who? will be addressed. Practitioners will present the general characteristics of the emergency arbitrator provisions and share their experience.
Questions and Answers
Concluding remarks
13.00 - 14.30 Lunch