ICC Home Home
Sharing experience
Governance codes
Governance news
Useful links
Related events
Contact us
Guide to the basics
Board of directors
Disclosure and transparency
Shareholders
Accounting standards
Auditing practices
Governance models
Regulatory frameworks
Governance impact
Risk management
Foreign investment
Financial markets
Non-listed companies
Family-owned companies
ICC roundtables
Beijing, October 2004
Istanbul, April 2005
London, October 2005
Prague, April 2007
ICC documents
Statements
Press releases
Loading...

Blueprint for tougher governance in Hong Kong

4 February 2004

Improvements in Hong Kong's corporate governance are in train following consecutive announcements by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKSE).

While both the voluminous SFC blueprint and news stock exchange rules mark a substantial step forward, critics have suggested investors are still left out in the cold. There is still some uncertainty as to whether the HKSE will be forced to relinquish its regulatory role to the SFC, as had been planned by the government until it opted for more consultation.

The SFC blueprint adopts many of the best practices recommended by the OECD and adopted in Western countries like the United States and much of the European Union.

It has said that key elements such as disclosure of information and details of transactions between interested parties in all listed companies and IPOs should be taken out of the HKSE's voluntary codebook and made enforceable by law, with heavy penalties for miscreants. The HKSE wants only some disclosure rules handed over to the SFC. But the SFC has softened its approach on other issues, saying it would be happy to let the exchange continue to operate the other listing rules, and to supervise corporate governance standards.

The HKSE is still weighing up toughening the rules for:

  • disclosing directors' pay packages;

  • tightening the deadlines for yearly and half yearly corporate reporting;

  • introducing quarterly financial reporting or quarterly trading statements for large companies;

  • a requirement for boards to have more than three independent directors.

So far it has ruled out making these requirements mandatory or more than 'recommended'. The government is expected to make a final decision on what should be regulated and by whom in the next few months.


Bookmark and Share
Corporate Governance News Archives 2002-2004 News Archives
Court of Arbitration Bookstore Policy Events Institute WCF ATA CCS
 
Copyright 2010 International Chamber of Commerce
Copyright, trademark and privacy notice

ICC Copyright

RSS

 
ICC    Home E-mail Print Search