ICC clarifies "original document" language in UCP 500ICC clarifies "original document" language in UCP 500

 
 
About ICC News Archives Bookstore CCS Search Home site
Bookmark and Share
Loading...

ICC clarifies "orig inal document" language in UCP 500

Paris, 12 July 1999 - The Banking Commission of the International Chamber of Commerce has issued an official Decision clarifying what constitutes an "original document" under UCP 500, its universally accepted rules on letters of credit.

The clarification, which does not amend UCP 500, proved necessary because a 1996 UK court case, Glencore International AG v Bank of China, narrowly construed the meaning of "original" in sub-Article 20(b) of the ICC rules. As a result, document checkers worldwide tended to take an overly conservative view of what constituted an original for the purpose of the rules and were often unnecessarily stamping documents "original" as a precaution.

The ICC Decision follows closely on the reasoning of a more recent UK case, Kredietbank N.V. v Midland Bank PLC, which clarified the Glencore decision. The Lord Justice in the Kredietbank case said that the real intention of sub-Article 20(b) was "to widen the category of acceptable documents", not to narrow them.

The ICC Decision makes clear that "Banks do not undertake to determine whether a document is original in fact". It continues: "The UCP neither requires nor permits an examination beyond the face of a document to determine how the document was in fact produced, unless the document was produced by a bank, e.g. on a telefax, telex, e-mail or other system that prints out messages received by the bank."

The ICC Decision, which will be distributed to banks worldwide, offers a comprehensive overview of all possible situations – from documents that appear to be original but which are not, to hand signed, facsimile signed and photocopied documents as well. It should relieve document checkers from the uncertainty caused by the Glencore case.

ICC Decisions, while they do not carry legal force nor overturn court decisions, are widely read by the courts as an indication of how UCP 500 should be interpreted.

Full text of the ICC Decision on original documents
Commission on Banking Technique and Practice  


 

 

Istanbul news archives ICC Archives
 
ICC WCF ATA Policy Events Bookstore Court of Arbitration
 
  Copyright 2012 International Chamber of Commerce
Copyright, trademark and privacy notice



RSS